![]() |
|
![]() | ||
CWU T&S FACT SHEET
Index to Fact Sheets
TELSTRA FORCED ANNUAL LEAVE ISSUE
Telstra has pressed staff to take more leave. The motive is profits.
Leave is a liability on the balance sheet, and is accounted for in the profit and loss statements.
Accumulation of leave is not desirable as the bonus payments to the CEO and senior managers are affected. We can understand that if you face being terminated from Telstra in the next round of redundancies, that you do not believe in a "social compact" or a "team spirit". There will be another (alleged) shut down this Xmas - and you may be forced to take more leave. There are rumours that it will be more than 2 weeks! Below (in response to a number of members who do not want to take more leave) we summarize the situation as we see it. TELSTRA EBA The Telstra EBA was certified on 19 June 2020. See the full Telstra EBA19. FORCED ANNUAL LEAVE EBA PROVISION The EBA provision did not change with the new EBA19. It states: Taking annual leave b) Telstra may direct you to take leave if it's reasonable to do so. Examples of when Telstra might do this include:
FORCED ANNUAL LEAVE NOTES There are four important matters to note:
TELSTRA FORCED ANNUAL LEAVE
If pressured by management or told that it is a requirement that you take leave: It is a breach of the Fair Work Act to knowingly make a misleading statement or to coerce a person to take or not take a workplace right. WHAT IS A FORTNIGHT? Nine day workers are still being asked to take 10 days. a reminder of the telstra hr (Melbourne) clarification. some gung-ho supervisors are still demanding 10 days from 9 day workers: telstra said: 8/9 day fortnight and 12 hour shift: I acknowledge that we need to be clear on this point so I will be updating the company faq's shortly to reflect that:
TELSTRA LEAVE - YOU ARE NOT ALONE May 20: According to a pie chart circulated in nsw, only 21% of staff booked the 10 days annual leave before September. OUR HELP If you are asked or directed to take leave outside these parameters, we are here to assist. See below for contact details. WHAT TELSTRA SAYS We have had a number of exchanges with telstra as local team leaders push the envelope. The email exchanges below show how cautious the HQ hr are as they do not support the local managers! Telstra agrees that it is voluntary. However telstra appeals to you to help their profits. What is clear is that local team leaders are being pressured to force the issue. TELSTRA FORCED LEAVE - OUR POSITION - LETTER TO TELSTRA This is not the case here. there is a significant mismatch between what hr tells us - and what happens in the field.
Let me be clear - we do not oppose telstra making a simple request to take leave. it is the tactics that we complain of.
Re the emails below: the clear threat. "i know that xxx will be circling back by the end of the week to unsure (sic) that this requirement has been met" (emphasis added)
In the group email, xxx named persons who needed to meet the requirement. therefore the pressure raises legitimate issues of breaches of the fair work act - where penalties apply telstra and individual managers (knowingly concerned and directly involved) may be found to be breaching some provisions of the act, particularly as telstra was put on notice some time ago.
s343 - Coercion
s345 Misrepresentations
It is false to say or imply that it is a "requirement" to take leave. the response is demanded by today - 29 April 20 We require that telstra (and others) withdraw the emails to staff and apologize for their overreach. We also require that other coercion, either by way of verbal messages (eg the (higher up) manager will speak to you if you don't) or email be withdrawn. We further require that all staff be advised that if they felt pressured to book leave, that they should feel free to cancel the booked leave.
TELSTRA RESPONSE Telstra responded to the email with carefully chosen words: That being said I have investigated the issue you raised on Wednesday (29th April). I have been advised that the email you referenced from Wayne Lee was directed to his leadership team. The purpose of this email was to prepare for a follow up meeting (subsequently held on Wednesday the 29th) with the whole team where a number of items were clarified and talked through, this was the reason for his general statement of `10 days leave' rather than listing specific details.
Furthermore any inconsistent messaging and misunderstandings arising from Nelson Leclair's email was comprehensively addressed in the Wednesday meeting (presumably at or around the time you emailed me your concerns). Additionally I have been advised that Wayne and the team have already discussed and dealt with a number of individual concerns/exemptions.
I encourage you to reach out to your members and confirm their latest understanding following the Wednesday team meeting. As always I am happy to address any individual employee concerns should you wish to raise them with me.
VIP - CONTACTING US Authorised by Dan Dwyer Branch Secretary
|
Index to Fact Sheets
|